Close
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Danna McKitrick
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Attorneys
    • Tabitha L. Atwell
    • Sarah L. Ayers
    • Ruth A. Binger
    • David R. Bohm
    • William J. Bruin, Jr.
    • Ronald N. Danna
    • A. Thomas DeWoskin
    • Katherine M. Flett
    • Richard A. Hoffman
    • Michael J. McKitrick
    • Marcia Swihart Orgill
    • Diana M. Plescia
    • Adam D. Rosenberg
    • Bryan J. Schrempf
    • Brian S. Weinstock
    • Kristina M. Yagelski
    • View All Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Business
      & Corporate Law
      • Banks & Financial Institutions
      • Bankruptcy & Creditors’ Rights
      • Business Advisory
      • Cybersecurity & Data Protection
      • Employment Law
      • Franchise Law
      • Health Care Law
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property
      • Real Estate
      • Tax & Accounting
      • Workers’ Compensation
    • Life &
      Legacy Planning
      • Education Law
      • Estate Planning
      • Guardianships & Conservatorships
      • Probate
    • Litigation
      & Dispute Resolution
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Litigation
      • Professional Liability Defense
      • Public Pensions & Government Litigation
    • View All Practice Areas
  • Industries
    • Banks & Financial Institutions
    • Business Organizations
    • Condominiums & Community Associations
    • Construction
    • Franchise Law
    • Health Care Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Manufacturers & Distributors
    • Non-Profit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Restaurants & Entertainment
    • Start-Ups & Emerging Businesses
    • Transportation & Trucking
    • View All Industries
  • Insights & News
  • 314.726.1000
  • Monday – Friday, 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Danna McKitrick Logo in Blue
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Danna McKitrick
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Attorneys
    • Tabitha L. Atwell
    • Sarah L. Ayers
    • Ruth A. Binger
    • David R. Bohm
    • William J. Bruin, Jr.
    • Ronald N. Danna
    • A. Thomas DeWoskin
    • Katherine M. Flett
    • Richard A. Hoffman
    • Michael J. McKitrick
    • Marcia Swihart Orgill
    • Diana M. Plescia
    • Adam D. Rosenberg
    • Bryan J. Schrempf
    • Brian S. Weinstock
    • Kristina M. Yagelski
    • View All Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Business
      & Corporate Law
      • Banks & Financial Institutions
      • Bankruptcy & Creditors’ Rights
      • Business Advisory
      • Cybersecurity & Data Protection
      • Employment Law
      • Franchise Law
      • Health Care Law
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property
      • Real Estate
      • Tax & Accounting
      • Workers' Compensation
    • Life &
      Legacy Planning
      • Education Law
      • Estate Planning
      • Guardianships & Conservatorships
      • Probate
    • Litigation
      & Dispute Resolution
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Litigation
      • Professional Liability Defense
      • Public Pensions & Government Litigation
    • View All Practice Areas
  • Industries
    • Banks & Financial Institutions
    • Business Organizations
    • Condominiums & Community Associations
    • Construction
    • Franchise Law
    • Health Care Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Manufacturers & Distributors
    • Non-Profit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Restaurants & Entertainment
    • Start-Ups & Emerging Businesses
    • Transportation & Trucking
    • View All Industries
  • Insights & News
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Danna McKitrick
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Business & Corporate Law
    • Life & Legacy Planning
    • Litigation & Defense
    • View All Practice Areas
  • Industries
  • Insights & News
Danna McKitrick Logo in Blue
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Danna McKitrick
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Attorneys
    • Tabitha L. Atwell
    • Sarah L. Ayers
    • Ruth A. Binger
    • David R. Bohm
    • William J. Bruin, Jr.
    • Ronald N. Danna
    • A. Thomas DeWoskin
    • Katherine M. Flett
    • Richard A. Hoffman
    • Michael J. McKitrick
    • Marcia Swihart Orgill
    • Diana M. Plescia
    • Adam D. Rosenberg
    • Bryan J. Schrempf
    • Brian S. Weinstock
    • Kristina M. Yagelski
    • View All Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Business
      & Corporate Law
      • Banks & Financial Institutions
      • Bankruptcy & Creditors’ Rights
      • Business Advisory
      • Cybersecurity & Data Protection
      • Employment Law
      • Franchise Law
      • Health Care Law
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property
      • Real Estate
      • Tax & Accounting
      • Workers' Compensation
    • Life &
      Legacy Planning
      • Education Law
      • Estate Planning
      • Guardianships & Conservatorships
      • Probate
    • Litigation
      & Dispute Resolution
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Litigation
      • Professional Liability Defense
      • Public Pensions & Government Litigation
    • View All Practice Areas
  • Industries
    • Banks & Financial Institutions
    • Business Organizations
    • Condominiums & Community Associations
    • Construction
    • Franchise Law
    • Health Care Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Manufacturers & Distributors
    • Non-Profit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Restaurants & Entertainment
    • Start-Ups & Emerging Businesses
    • Transportation & Trucking
    • View All Industries
  • Insights & News
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Danna McKitrick
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Business & Corporate Law
    • Life & Legacy Planning
    • Litigation & Defense
    • View All Practice Areas
  • Industries
  • Insights & News

Corporate Transparency Act Update: Do You Still Need to File?

Danna McKitrick
March 27, 2025
Business Law

At Danna McKitrick, P.C., we’ve been closely tracking developments surrounding the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) since it was first passed in 2020. As the law’s long-anticipated reporting requirements neared enforcement, we worked to keep our clients informed, prepared, and compliant with the evolving guidance.

Then, in early 2024, the rules changed, and business owners across the country found themselves scrambling to understand whether they needed to file. Now, thanks to a major court decision and new federal guidance, the rules have shifted once again. And for many, the filing requirement is temporarily off the table.

Here’s what you need to know now, and what may be coming next.

As the court battle played out, the enforcement timeline became unclear, and many businesses were left unsure about their next steps.

At every turn, our firm remained alert to changes, making sure our clients had accurate, up-to-date information about what was required and when.

What is the CTA?

The Corporate Transparency Act was designed to combat money laundering and financial crime by requiring companies to disclose their beneficial owners, the individuals who ultimately own or control a business entity.

Unless a business met one of 23 CTA reporting exemptions, it was required to file a Beneficial Ownership Information Report (BOIR) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). That report included personal details about each beneficial owner, such as name, birthdate, address, and a copy of an identification document. The law went into effect January 1, 2024 (with enforcement set to begin on January 1, 2025), initiating a wave of confusion and urgency among small business owners.

Throughout 2024, the CTA faced mounting legal challenges. In late 2024, a federal court in the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the reporting requirement was unconstitutional and issued a nationwide stay. As the court battle played out, the enforcement timeline became unclear, and many businesses were left unsure about their next steps.

At every turn, our firm remained alert to changes, making sure our clients had accurate, up-to-date information about what was required and when.

What changed in 2025?

On March 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that it will not enforce any penalties or fines associated with the CTA’s beneficial ownership reporting rule under the current regulatory framework. That means no enforcement actions will be taken against:
• U.S. citizens
• Domestic reporting companies
• Their beneficial owners

Yesterday, on March 26, 2025, the Treasury issued an interim rule that significantly narrows the scope of the CTA. Under this update, only certain foreign entities doing business in the United States are currently required to file.

This rule is not yet final. The government has opened a 60-day public comment period, ending May 25, 2025, before finalizing the new version of the law. After reviewing those comments, the agency is expected to issue a final version of the rule that will define long-term compliance obligations.

Submit a comment or read the proposed rule (external site)

What Does This Mean for Your Business?

As of now, most domestic entities (including corporations and LLCs) are no longer required to file BOIRs under the CTA. However, this pause in enforcement may be temporary. Once the final rule is published, the requirements could change again.

Here’s the current status:

  • Domestic companies: Not required to file at this time.
  • Foreign entities doing business in the U.S.: Still subject to reporting.
  • All businesses: Encouraged to stay alert and be ready to respond once the final rule is issued.
A smiling businessman in suit and tie looks to his left while on a phone call.

Count on Us to Keep You Informed

The Corporate Transparency Act has proven to be one of the most complex and fluid compliance challenges faced by businesses in recent years. At Danna McKitrick, we are committed to helping our clients not only understand these shifting requirements, but also make smart, timely decisions to stay ahead of regulatory changes with clarity and confidence.

Our team will continue to monitor every development closely and provide clear, actionable guidance as new rules take shape. If you have questions about how the CTA may affect your business, whether you qualify for an exemption, or how to prepare for what comes next, we are here to help you navigate this evolving landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this the final FINAL rule removing the filing requirement?

While the future of any legislation can be uncertain, as the U.S. Department of the Treasury has announced it will not enforce penalties or fines associated with the reporting rule at any time for domestic entities, filing is on a voluntary-only basis and the requirement is not and will not be enforced for domestic corporations, limited liability companies and similar related entities.

Is anyone still required to file?

Companies formed outside the U.S. (“foreign reporting companies”) who do business domestically will still need to submit a report. The exception is that the information of any U.S. person who is a beneficial owner of the foreign entity need not be included in its report.

What happens to my information if I have already filed a report?

If Danna McKitrick has previously filed a report on your behalf, we will retain a copy should it be needed in the future, but no further updates will be required. All information submitted was uploaded into the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network database, the Beneficial Ownership Secure System (‘BOSS’), which is a secure nonpublic database which utilizes information security methods and techniques that are appropriate to protect non-classified information security systems at the highest level, as per FinCEN.

Third parties are asking to help me file my beneficial ownership information report. Is it okay to ignore them?

Unfortunately, many third-party filing agencies are still sending out e-mail blasts encouraging business owners to let them assist in filing the report. As mentioned above, the U.S. Treasury will not be enforcing the requirement for domestic companies.

What is an “interim” final rule? When will the rule be final?

FinCEN will be issuing the final rule this year. Following the March 26, 2025, issuance of the interim final rule, FinCEN is accepting comments for a period of 60 days, with a deadline of May 25, 2025. Given the timeline, late Summer or Early Fall 2025 should see the issuance of the final rule. Comments are accepted via the Federal Register at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/26/2025-05199/beneficial-ownership-information-reporting-requirement-revision-and-deadline-extension


Business LawCorporate Transparency Act

Related Articles


Front facade of the U.S. Supreme Court building
Title VII, Clarified: How the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ames Affects Reverse Discrimination Claims
July 14, 2025
Business Law
Closeup photo of a woman on a laptop, agreeing to terms and conditions on her screen
The $1.6 Million Mistake: Terms & Conditions Lessons from a Retail Giant
July 8, 2025
Business Law

A headshot of Danna McKitrick Principal Attorney Bryan J. Schrempf
Bryan J. Schrempf Elected as Principal
Previous Article
Missouri's Paid Sick Leave Law: Quickly Approaching Deadline on April 15, 2025
Next Article

Danna McKitrick Logo in Blue
Danna McKitrick is a mid-sized law firm delivering sophisticated, results-driven legal counsel across a wide range of practice areas. We provide strategic guidance to businesses and individuals, combining deep expertise with responsive service to achieve superior outcomes.
Contact
  • Danna McKitrick, P.C.
  • 314.726.1000
  • info@dmfirm.com
  • 7701 Forsyth Blvd., Ste. 1200
    St. Louis, MO 63105
Resources
  • Pay Online
  • Contact Us
  • Practice Areas
  • Our Attorneys
  • Insights & News
Connect
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin

© 2025 Danna McKitrick, P.C. Attorneys at Law  |  Legal Disclaimers

This website uses cookies

Our website relies upon cookies and selected third-party technologies to improve your experience, and for proper operation of all site functions. Denying or withdrawing consent may adversely impact this site's performance.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}